[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-bug
Subject:    Re: [LSR v2.18] " Snap-pizzicato markup ("Bartok pizzicato")"obsoleteand twofold
From:       "Phil Holmes" <mail () philholmes ! net>
Date:       2014-02-22 15:15:52
Message-ID: leaeuv$rqb$1 () ger ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

"Pierre Perol-Schneider" <pierre.schneider.paris@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:CAPHOTuX7isTnb0xM6i+i6EbT3r3d04kTT+A4gcuOR1oqzKDs4w@mail.gmail.com...
> 2014-02-22 15:43 GMT+01:00 Phil Holmes <mail@philholmes.net>:
>
>
>>   the second is a duplicate of what is in the NR, Section 2.3.  I'd
>> suggest I delete both, unless anyone shouts?
>>
>
> Sure it is, like many others are (there's a link between the LSR and the
> DOC isn't it?)
> Please do not delete this one.

Generally, there can be.  If the document explicitly includes the snippet, 
then deleting it would remove it from the docs.  However, I checked and the 
mention of the snap pizz. is explicitly coded in the NR section: it's not 
included from the LSR and so the snippet should be safe to remove.

-- 
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad 




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]