[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-bug
Subject:    Re: Tie control-points delete another tie
From:       "Trevor Daniels" <t.daniels () treda ! co ! uk>
Date:       2008-07-23 22:57:02
Message-ID: 9C003467CB2E40C0AECB772774B292CA () TrevorLaptop
[Download RAW message or body]


In fact what you call "first voice" and "second voice"
are both in the same Voice context.  The tie
override affects both ties because they occur at the
same musical moment (assuming the tie in your "second
voice" is intended to be between the two notes
immediately following the override) and are in the
same context.

It's not clear what you are trying to achieve here,
as the ties without the override look ok.

Trevor

> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Marco Caliari <marco.caliari@univr.it>
> Subject: Tie control-points delete another tie
> To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <loom.20080723T142751-715@post.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>> I'm not top posting.
>
> Dear all,
>
> in the following snippet
>
> \version "2.11.52"
> \paper{ ragged-right=##t }
> \new Staff {
> <<
> % first voice
>  {d''2 ~ d''
>   d''2 ~ d''}
> % second voice in parallel
>  {f'2 f'
>   \once\override Tie  #'control-points =
>   #'((1.5 . -0.5) (2 . 1) (7 . 2) (8 . -1))
>   f'2 f'}\\
> % third voice
>  {c'2  c'
>   c'2  c'}
>>>
> }
>
>
> the \override command in the second voice deletes the tie in the first 
> voice
> (the tie in the second voice is terrible, but it does not matter).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marco
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
>
> End of bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 68, Issue 26
> ********************************************
> 




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]