[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       licq-main
Subject:    Re: [Licq-main] Re: invisible bug
From:       Tim =?iso-8859-1?Q?Terleg=E5rd?= <timte878 () student ! liu ! se>
Date:       2000-03-27 6:14:29
[Download RAW message or body]

> > Right. That's because the server doesn't send us the offline status update,
> > so we won't notice.
> >
> > > Is this proper behaviour?
> >
> > Well. The way to make it more intuitive would be to ignore the TCP status
> > if the user is reported as offline by the server.
> >
> > on the other side, you would never notice if an invisible user requests your
> > away response and I think there are enough users who like this "bug" ;-)
>
> The server actually is supposed to send the offline packet for users who
> were invisible.  It doesn't sometimes, but this is a server bug.

Oh, cool  ;)
How did you figure out how the icq protocol works, is it documented somewhere?

/ Tim
tim@se.linux.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]