[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: licq-devel
Subject: Re: [Licq-devel] Latest CVS and Visibilty Issues
From: Martin <licq () it4linux ! de>
Date: 2005-09-12 16:08:31
Message-ID: 4325A7FF.60703 () it4linux ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
Hello wwp , hello list ;-)
wwp wrote:
>Hello Martin,
>
>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:34:22 +0200 Martin <licq@it4linux.de> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>(in)visibility seem to be fixed ...
>>
>>but if you put someone on the visibile AND the invisible list the resulting
>>state seem to be the list where the person was added last.
>>
>>but I think this is only an GUI issue
>>
>>
>[snip]
>
>I'm not sure that it's (only/even) a GUI issue. Let's imagine that the
>protocol allows this, so what to expect? What you encounter would then seem
>reasonable or logical or.. arbitrary :-).
>
>
OK ... it IS possible to put someone on both lists ...
as stated before the resulting state depends on the order, it you
remove the person after that from one list, the resulting state is the
other list's state ...
I would personally prefer to set it "exclusive or" , but that's only my
opinion,
as I think that it is not possible to give the invisible list a
precedence.
Regards
Martin
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hello wwp , hello list ;-)<br>
<br>
wwp wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20050912174202.6046cd3e@localhost.localdomain"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello Martin,
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:34:22 +0200 Martin <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" \
href="mailto:licq@it4linux.de"><licq@it4linux.de></a> wrote: </pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
(in)visibility seem to be fixed ...
but if you put someone on the visibile AND the invisible list the resulting
state seem to be the list where the person was added last.
but I think this is only an GUI issue
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->[snip]
I'm not sure that it's (only/even) a GUI issue. Let's imagine that the
protocol allows this, so what to expect? What you encounter would then seem
reasonable or logical or.. arbitrary :-).
</pre>
</blockquote>
OK ... it IS possible to put someone on both lists ...<br>
as stated before the resulting state depends on the order, it you <br>
remove the person after that from one list, the resulting state is the <br>
other list's state ...<br>
<br>
I would personally prefer to set it "exclusive or" , but that's only my
opinion, <br>
as I think that it is not possible to give the invisible list a
precedence.<br>
<br>
Regards <br>
Martin <br>
</body>
</html>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Licq-devel mailing list
Licq-devel@licq.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic