[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       libvir-list
Subject:    Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] bridge_driver: use conffile for dnsmasq if it exists
From:       Paweł_Krześniak <pawel.krzesniak () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-12-27 17:48:20
Message-ID: AANLkTinP1kp2cw9sLK4xdWALmEcimaCma5Dj8e1Jf0zS () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2010/12/23 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>:
> Rather than tying the element name to our current choice of program, can
> we come up with something more generic?
>
> <network>
>  <name>xxxnet</name>
>  <ipv4routing>/usr/local/bin/my-dnsmasq</ipv4routing>
>  <ipv6routing>/usr/local/bin/my-radvd</ipv6routing>
> </network>
>
> But the idea of allowing the XML to specify an override for the program
> to run seems like it might be worthwhile.

I don't think <ipv[46]routing> are the best names, because it goes
rather about tuning settings for DNS/DHCP (or NDP for ipv6) or
starting additional services per started network and not setting
routing.

Temporary ignoring the naming I prepared following patch:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-December/msg01052.html

What do you think?

-- 
Pawel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]