[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       libsigc-list
Subject:    [sigc] Re: Return values in libsigc++ 2.0
From:       Martin Schulze <martin-ml () hippogriff ! de>
Date:       2004-05-20 20:35:13
Message-ID: 20040520203513.GA11184 () ipcnotebook ! schulze
[Download RAW message or body]

I've committed the necessary change to cvs.
2.0.2 will be released by the end of this weekend.

Regards,

  Martin


Am 2004.05.15 23:42 schrieb(en) Timothy M. Shead:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> 
>> A solution would be transfer some code from sigc::signalN::emit()  
>> into
>> sigc::internal::signal_emitN::emit() which has a specialization for  
>> the
>> case that no accumulator is specified. The behaviour would only  
>> change
>> for the case that an accumulator is specified: the accumulator's   
>> operator() would always be called like it was the case for  
>> marshallers  in 1.2. I think we could consider this as a bug fix so  
>> it could go into
>> libsigc++-2.0.2 which could be released in a few days time. Does  
>> this
>> sound like a reasonable plan?
> 
> Works for me!  Many thanks!
> Tim
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]