[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       libreoffice-ux-advise
Subject:    [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 99528] New: Better handling for multiline tabs
From:       bugzilla-daemon () bugs ! documentfoundation ! org
Date:       2016-04-27 11:00:46
Message-ID: bug-99528-39828 () http ! bugs ! documentfoundation ! org/
[Download RAW message or body]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99528

            Bug ID: 99528
           Summary: Better handling for multiline tabs
           Product: LibreOffice
           Version: Inherited From OOo
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: ux-advise
          Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: Samuel.Mehrbrodt@cib.de
                CC: libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org

Created attachment 124669
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=124669&action=edit
Paragraph style: Current layout

Currently we have some dialogs which have multiple rows of tabs, for example
the "paragraph style" dialog.

I find it highly confusing to use this kind of tabs. As they are not in one
row, it is hard to read all tabs to get a glance what tabs you have. Also when
selecting a tab from the top, that row moves to the bottom, which is even more
confusing, since the position of all tabs changes.

I have two ideas how to improve the situation:
1. Leave the tabs as they are (multiline), but don't switch rows when selecting
a tab from the top.
2. Stop using multiline tabs at all and use vertical tabs instead (have them on
the left).

Any thougts on this?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]