[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       libreoffice
Subject:    Re: Windows installer errors and warnings
From:       Eike Rathke <erack () redhat ! com>
Date:       2024-04-24 9:58:41
Message-ID: ZijYbzmBJH0BEUzE () remotee ! erack ! redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


Hi,

On Tuesday, 2024-04-23 19:11:58 +0200, Jakub Kościelak wrote:

> > > ICE03	ERROR	Invalid identifier; Table: Directory, Column: Directory, Key(s): \
> > > LO_progr_resou_ca@va_LCMES_c8cb7e943 ICE03	ERROR	Invalid identifier; Table: \
> > > Directory, Column: Directory, Key(s): LO_progr_resou_kmr@l_LCMES_c75f6f5fa
> > where ca@va seems to stem from ca-valencia or kmr@l from kmr-Latn.
> 
> I now know where these "@" signs come from. We use this script
> C:\24.2.3.1\solenv\bin\localestr: #!/bin/sh case "$1" in ca-valencia) echo
> ca@valencia ;; kmr-Latn) echo kmr@latin ;; sr-Latn) echo sr@latin ;;
> hu-hung) echo hu@hung ;; *) echo $1 | tr '-' '_' ;; esac in these places:
> C:\24.2.3.1\scp2\macros\macro.pl
> C:\24.2.3.1\solenv\gbuild\AllLangMoTarget.mk
> C:\24.2.3.1\solenv\gbuild\extensions\post_PackageInfo.mk and now out of
> curiosity I have 2 questions: 1. What was/is the reason that for 4 languages
> we replace "-" with "@" instead of underscore? 2. Is it obsolete or is it
> still needed?

The ca@valencia and the like include the glibc @modifiers. This is
correct. Whatever later scrambles those to ca@va_LCMES_c8cb7e943 for
Windows would need to adjust that to something like
ca_va_LCMES_c8cb7e943

  Eike

-- 
GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]