[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       leaf-user
Subject:    RE: [leaf-user] Routing for multiple uplinks for Bering 1.2- More Info [faked-from][sls]
From:       "Simon Chalk" <zen10984 () zen ! co ! uk>
Date:       2003-09-29 15:48:18
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Troy,

Thanks for this, I think my main problem was that I did not include the
||true at the end of each line. It seems that you need this for multi line
statements.

Regards,

Simon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Troy Aden [mailto:Troy.Aden@VCom.com]
Sent: 29 September 2003 16:22
To: 'Simon Chalk'; Leaf-User List
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Routing for multiple uplinks for Bering 1.2-
More Info [faked-from][sls]


Here is what I have done on our Bering routers to add routes.

up ip route add 192.168. *.*/24 via 192.168.*.* || true
up ip route add 192.168. *.*/24 via 192.168. *.* || true
up ip route add 192.168. *.*/24 via 192.168. *.* || true
up ip route add 192.168. *.*/24 via 192.168. *.* || true

Hope this helps.

Troy


-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Chalk [mailto:zen10984@zen.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 8:39 AM
To: Leaf-User List
Subject: [leaf-user] Routing for multiple uplinks for Bering 1.2- More Info
[faked-from][sls]

Hi All,

Further to my first post.

I am adding all the ip route commands to /etc/network/interfaces

using

up ip route etc.etc
up ip rule add etc.etc

It appears that not all the commands are been loaded. I think it is the ip
rule add bit.

So my question is should I be using a different file, or is my syntax wrong.
Am I correct to prefix each command with up.

Regards,

Simon.

-----Original Message-----
From: leaf-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:leaf-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Simon Chalk
Sent: 29 September 2003 13:18
To: Leaf-User List
Subject: [leaf-user] Routing for multiple uplinks for Bering 1.2


Hi All,

I am trying to implement the split access configuration which will allow my
Bering 1.2 box to correctly route to two ISP's as described on the LARTC
site.

http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html

I have created two new entries in the /etc/iproute2/rt_tables file and
followed the instructions.

It appears not to be working, and the first thing I note is that I don't see
my new tables listed when I enter

ip rule show

I only see the default entries. Should I see these tables listed?

Should I be able to configure this in Bering, or do I need to enable some
other setting before attempting to follow the instructions.

Regards,

Simon.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic