[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       leaf-devel
Subject:    Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem
From:       kp kirchdoerfer <kapeka () users ! sourceforge ! net>
Date:       2015-07-31 23:40:34
Message-ID: 2637448.MjaxFqpBUL () stalker
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Erich;

Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2015, 22:27:35 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
> =

> Am 30.07.2015 um 19:18 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> ....
> =

> > As I said above, default should be seamless.
> =

> How would you do that? =CEf there are any parameters needed, they have to
> be introduced. What about upgrading systems on the fly, do you really
> want to massage leaf.cfg? I for myself dont.

In fact this sounded too ambitious.
Looking at build_upgade you are searching for the sqfs files. I assume that=
 the =

update script will be ready for 5.2 or later; and for 5.1.x we do not suppp=
ort =

sqfs. So update script and the change in leaf.cfg will be made the same tim=
e.

A note: New parameters could be necessary from time to time, we've tried to=
 be =

as stable as possible in the past, and we'll do in future.

What I meant with "seamless", was the idea to make "saving to moddb" the =

default, so nothing will change compared to the current behaviour. =



> >>> The code to save to and use moddb isn't really working yet, at least =
for
> >>> me. But I think we should have that ready when releasing the next rc
> >>> with
> >>> modules.sqfs insteasd of modules.tgz.
> >> =

> >> To me it does not make a difference if it is a tgz file or sqfs, I won=
't
> >> use it anyway except for upgrade and then be done with it. I prefer
> >> moddb.lrp. I don't like the idea of a parameter because it adds
> >> complexity.
> > =

> > The implementation in 5.2 will be pretty straightforward even for small,
> > but nowadays common boxes  with more than 32MB of storage.
> > To support still smaller/older systems (or to speedup boot) adding code=
 to
> > save and use moddb is all I'm asking for.
> =

> There should be no code needed, just discard the changes to apkg, it did
> not know about this in the past and IMHO it should not care where the
> modules came from, just save them.
> =

> Ahhhh.... btw. could you please try to test build_upgrade and add the
> files it is complaining about, if any. I have no way to test for another
> few months.

I've added a 5_2 directory with all files build_upgrade requires. I guess I=
'm =

missing the next step...?

What is your idea about the naming of tzhe branches?

kp


---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]