[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: lartc
Subject: [LARTC] Re: A complicated routing scenario (for me at least)
From: Andrew andrewd () uccsda ! org
Date: 2000-11-30 21:50:07
[Download RAW message or body]
<PRE>Season's Greetings:
If anyone is still watching this thread, I'm still working on my setup. Today I
have a very specific question:
I execute the following command at the prompt:
ip rule add from 100.100.100.80/29 to 10.5.5.0/24 iif eth0 lookup dmz-lan
priority 230
Then I run the following:
><i>ip rule ls
</I>
Which among other things lists the following for the rule I just added above:
><i>230: from 100.100.100.80/24 to 10.5.5.0/24 iif eth0 lookup dmz-lan (it IS typed correctly)
</I>
Furthermore if I try to run the following going off the output of ip rule ls
above:
><i>ip rule delete from 100.100.100.80/24 to 10.5.5.0/24 iif eth0
</I>
I get the following answer:
><i>RTNETLINK answers: no such process
</I>
But if I run the command modified slightly as follows:
><i>ip rule delete from 100.100.100.80/29 to 10.5.5.0/24 iif eth0
</I>
It works (deletes the rule) and ip rule ls verfies that it no longer exists.
What is going on?! It seems to me that ip rule ls should match what I put in
with ip rule add.
Why isn't it?
BTW. all the above IP addresses are completely bogus.
Thanks for the help!
-Andrew
--
<A HREF="mailto:depaan@bibleinfo.com">depaan@bibleinfo.com</A>
--------------------------------------------------------------
Want answers to life's big questions? Visit www.bibleinfo.com.
</PRE>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic