[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lartc
Subject:    [LARTC] Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL
From:       Russell Stuart <russell () stuart ! id ! au>
Date:       2006-06-27 6:19:45
Message-ID: 44A0CE01.4010109 () stuart ! id ! au
[Download RAW message or body]

On 26/06/2006 9:10 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>5.  We still did have to modify the kernel for ATM.  That was
>>    because of its rather unusual characteristics.  However,
>>    it you look at the size of modifications made to the kernel
>>    verses the size made to the user space tool, (37 lines
>>    versus 303 lines,) the bulk of the work was does in user
>>    space.
> 
> I'm sorry, but arguing that a limited special case solution is
> better because it needs slightly less code is just not reasonable.

Without seeing your actual proposal it is difficult to
judge whether this is a reasonable trade-off or not.
Hopefully we will see your code soon.  Do you have any
idea when?
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]