From kwrite-devel  Mon May 23 10:42:19 2011
From: Milian Wolff <mail () milianw ! de>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:42:19 +0000
To: kwrite-devel
Subject: Re: kate 4.6 is so slow I'm going to have to switch to a different
Message-Id: <201105231242.19463.mail () milianw ! de>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kwrite-devel&m=130614737827726
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============1844569199=="

--===============1844569199==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1650261.k6uAYlWbPZ";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart1650261.k6uAYlWbPZ
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Carlo, 23.05.2011:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Steven LeCompte <scilec@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've been using kate for years as my primary code editor for php, css,
> > html, javascript, bash, etc.
> > Ever since 4.6 was released, kate has become unbearably slow.  For
> > example, when I type some code on a new line, it can take kate's buffer
> > anywhere from 1-5 seconds to "catch up" with my typing and actually
> > display what I've typed.
> > I know this isn't unique to one machine, since I use kate on 2 different
> > hosts (one running a kate 4.6 on fresh install of Kubuntu 11.04 and the
> > other running Ubuntu 10.1).  Based on various blogs I've read, it looks
> > like a lot of other folks are frustrated with kate's sluggish
> > performance as well.
> >=20
> > I haven't bothered submitting a bug since your bugs database already has
> > a few submissions regarding this problem.
> > When are you planning to address this?  Two of my colleagues at work ha=
ve
> > already abandoned kate because of it's abysmal responsiveness and I'm
> > close to doing the same; but I'd rather not.  Performance issues aside,
> > kate is the best code editor I've ever used and I really want to keep
> > using it.  But at this point, kate's sluggishness has interrupted my
> > workflow so severely that I'll be forced to abandon kate if these
> > performance issues aren't addressed soon.
> >=20
> > Please tell me that there's a light at the end of the tunnel here!
> >=20
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >=20
> > Steve
> >=20
> > _______________________________________________
> > KWrite-Devel mailing list
> > KWrite-Devel@kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwrite-devel
>=20
> I had this problem with kdevelop too, there are no cpu spike or
> anything, it just freezes for a few seconds, I don't know if the
> problem is with the auto completion, but I don't have this issue
> anymore since I disabled it

Note that KDevelop does lots more than Kate and has some issues which may l=
ead=20
to lacks and freezes.

anyhow, this is unrelated
=2D-=20
Milian Wolff
mail@milianw.de
http://milianw.de

--nextPart1650261.k6uAYlWbPZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk3aOgsACgkQDA6yEs0dE5Np6QCdEMOEGBS7GH8IFZE6TtDEqV+e
9YsAni/GzXGsT1vwYt2cN19d2tgR8aQf
=Neb3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1650261.k6uAYlWbPZ--

--===============1844569199==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
KWrite-Devel mailing list
KWrite-Devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwrite-devel

--===============1844569199==--