[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kwrite-devel
Subject:    Re: Review Request: Use ##Alerts in python.xml (syntax hl)
From:       Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad () users ! sourceforge ! net>
Date:       2009-07-07 16:13:53
Message-ID: h2vs84$rgv$1 () ger ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Dominik Haumann wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> Dominik Haumann wrote:
>>> On Monday 06 July 2009, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>>>> Dominik Haumann wrote:
>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>>>>> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/896/#review1431
>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Ship it!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> looks good, ok to commit :)
>>>> Thanks; committed to trunk.
>>>>
>>>> Think this is worth backporting to 4.3? It's technically a "feature"
>>>> but it's pretty tiny (and no string changes or anything like that
>>>> AFAIK).
>>> If you think it's worth backporting go ahead :)
>> Thanks :-). I figure it's a nice feature for little cost, seems a shame
>> for it to get stuck waiting for 4.4. But before I do...
>>
>> I saw your reply to the commit twice, but didn't see a reply to my
>> response; maybe a mailer problem on one of our ends? Question was, is
>> "1.100" safe as the new version number ("1.100" > "1.99"), or do I need
>> to use something else?
> 
> make it n.nn, i.e 2.00 :)

Bleh, ##Alerts is *not* a major version bump :-).

/me makes note to never version any HL's as '1.9x'

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
You're on your own for the pony. -- Richard Hughes, on feature requests

_______________________________________________
KWrite-Devel mailing list
KWrite-Devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwrite-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]