[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kwrite-devel
Subject:    Re: B-method katepart highlight
From:       "Ivo Anjo" <knuckles () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-03-08 12:01:42
Message-ID: 557ea2710803080401vf22c2e7m4de03e6db2aafa43 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

So, is it going to be added upstream after all?
There have been no more comments on this for a while.

Ivo Anjo

On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Sebastian Pipping
<webmaster@hartwork.org> wrote:
> No errors from checkdtd, my vote for adding.
>  Screenshot attached.
>
>
>
>  Sebastian
>
>
>
>
>  Ivo Anjo ( [Knuckles] ) wrote:
>  >> Can you provide us a B-method example complex
>  >> enough to really see your highlighter in action?
>  >
>  > You can find lots of examples here:
>  > http://www.palgrave.com/science/computing/schneider/students/source_atoz.htm
>  >
>  > Some of the more complex are:
>  > http://www.palgrave.com/science/computing/schneider/students/sources/chap17/Heaparray.mch
>  > and
>  > http://www.palgrave.com/science/computing/schneider/students/sources/chap17/Heapi.imp
>  >
>  > That site has all the examples from the book I used. I also went and
>  > re-tested my highlighting with all those examples, and added some more
>  > keywords to the highlight file (b-method sure has a lot of them), so
>  > all of them should be fully highlighted and with code-folding ok.
>  >
>  > I didn't have to code anything more complex than those examples, but
>  > if needed I think I can come up with a more complex example.
>  >
>  > Ivo Anjo
>
>
_______________________________________________
KWrite-Devel mailing list
KWrite-Devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwrite-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]