From kwrite-devel Fri Jul 27 20:34:38 2007 From: Sebastian Pipping Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:34:38 +0000 To: kwrite-devel Subject: Re: Splitting incremental find and general search/replace Message-Id: <46AA56DE.2040907 () hartwork ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kwrite-devel&m=118556856129080 Anders Lund wrote: > On Friday 27 July 2007, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> But that actually is the problem: no search history. >> I requested a larger search history for EmEditor a while >> back because I use so many search patterns more than once, >> especially when search/replacing with regex and needed >> even more history. >> >> The only reason why I didn't even notice this feature missing before >> is because I don't use the Kate from trunk for daily work. >> I fully agree with Robert here. > > But we can still keep the history and add to it whenever we do a not > incremental search. --------------------------------------------------------- Shouldn't the whole search be incremental? I mean mixing this would be very confusing. If we split it into bar and dialog then I see no problem with the history as well. --------------------------------------------------------- > Related note: It allways irritated me that kate doesn't linke a search pattern > with the related replacement (select the corresponding item in the > replacement histyory when the search history is changed) --------------------------------------------------------- That's a good idea. In adition I would go even a step further and add "preset support" to enable the user to save and load the whole set of search dialog options plus pattern and replacement. I always wanted that feature. Sebastian _______________________________________________ KWrite-Devel mailing list KWrite-Devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwrite-devel