On Thursday 19 July 2007, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> On Thursday 19 July 2007 00:59, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > But still, can we maybe still provide both?
> >
> > What about extending the return type of the indent() function:
> > - if the return value is a single number -> interpret as tab+spaces
> > - if the return value is an array with 2 numbers -> interpret the first
> >   number as tab+spaces and the second one as (forced) spaces only
>
> We can do so. But as vim doesn't, too, I am not sure, if that really is a
> valid usecase, it makes the code much more complex, as the
> unindent/indent routines would need script logic than, too, as there
> could be interesting things happening on indent/unindent, or?

Right, indent/deindent would screw it up, but that's it then ;)

Dominik
_______________________________________________
KWrite-Devel mailing list
KWrite-Devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwrite-devel