From kwrite-devel  Sun Dec 16 17:57:06 2001
From: Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery () wanadoo ! fr>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:57:06 +0000
To: kwrite-devel
Subject: Fwd: Re: [Kwrite-devel] [PATCH] nice feature for kate..
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kwrite-devel&m=100852542616251

wrote to myself only ;o)
well, yes, anyway it's right. i had it right the first time by chance, since 
i forgot i was in a <pre> tag ;o)
so: no need to change anything in the last version sent.

emmanuel.
----------  Message transmis  ----------

Subject: Re: [Kwrite-devel] [PATCH] nice feature for kate..
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 18:40:17 -0500

well, i'm stupid. yes, we need to encode them, since <b> and others are
allowed. i misunderstood what <pre> stands for.
so, keep it as it is!

emmanuel.

Le Dimanche 16 Décembre 2001 18:35, vous avez écrit :
> > > yes, actually no need to encode entities, since we are in a <pre>
> > > tag...
> >
> > That's not what I meant, <, > and & still need to be escaped, otherwise
> > with things like QValueList<Employee>, the "<Employee>" will be
> > interpreted as markup and will not be visible. But all the other special
> > characters can remain as they are.
>
> they will be interpreted as tags even in a <pre> tag? that's what i was
> reffering to. i thought in that case they are not needed? (but i'm not
> sure).
>
> > regards
> >  daniel
>
> emmanuel.

--
dessine moi un mouton..
le ciel est vide sans imagination..

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
dessine moi un mouton..
le ciel est vide sans imagination..
_______________________________________________
kwrite-devel mailing list
kwrite-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwrite-devel