--===============9093794239972004437==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1947078.eULsdMKbWq"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit


--nextPart1947078.eULsdMKbWq
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi all,

just an idea I had today: do we really need the opacity menu in the Alt+F3 menu?

Reasons against the menu:
* menu in tasks applet does not provide the opacity (missing consistency)
* Opacity is not really useful as both foreground and background are modified (hard to read) 
and no blur behind
* Changing of opacity is still possible through titlebar wheel event or window rules or 
translucency effect
* Alt+F3 menu is really cluttered
* There is code to throw away the menu whenever the compositing state changes

Personally I don't see a good reason for having the opacity menu at all and I found it kind of 
techy (look what we can do: isn't that awesome? Translucent Windows!). So convince me to 
not remove it :-)

Cheers
Martin
--nextPart1947078.eULsdMKbWq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk5NScgACgkQqVXwidMiVrrO9QCfe23aRwqUXwCcOFQhYURQQNVD
Vb0An2CE8cIMA9R/BfsgIGKwLHNEjZ77
=Vl2n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1947078.eULsdMKbWq--


--===============9093794239972004437==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
kwin mailing list
kwin@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwin

--===============9093794239972004437==--