From kwin Sun Jan 30 15:59:16 2011 From: =?utf-8?Q?Thomas_L=C3=BCbking?= Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:59:16 +0000 To: kwin Subject: Re: Code Removal Message-Id: X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kwin&m=129640322413869 Am 29.01.2011, 15:49 Uhr, schrieb Martin Gräßlin : > I proposed such a repo some time ago and it didn't find agreement back > then. --> Here's one. =) > I just see one problem with it: BC. Why? The effect plugins have a version tag to guarantee API matches, this covers ABI as well. Whenever the tag gets bumped the distros will have to update the package, the situation would be not much different as it is atm with 3rd party plugins, just that KDE would host them and KWin could put some less relevant effects there which are currently in the core. > Maybe in plasma-addons released together with workspace it makes more > sense? This would not free us from development restrictions (i18n) or pace (delays on serious bugfixes delays, just think of the flipswitch issue - which i can stunningly not reproduce...), yesno? -- Cheers, Thomas _______________________________________________ kwin mailing list kwin@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwin