From kwin  Fri Jul 24 05:36:43 2009
From: Martin =?iso-8859-15?q?Gr=E4=DFlin?= <kde () martin-graesslin ! com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:36:43 +0000
To: kwin
Subject: Re: patch for #167138 (opacity rules ignored)
Message-Id: <200907240736.50377.kde () martin-graesslin ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kwin&m=124841386602301
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============0527806288=="

--===============0527806288==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2589980.zkKxFqKyP8";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart2589980.zkKxFqKyP8
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Freitag 24 Juli 2009 01:09:58 schrieb Thomas L=FCbking:
> Am Thursday 23 July 2009 schrieb Martin Gr=E4=DFlin:
> > Looks good to me (but not yet tested), just one question: how does it
> > behave when setting the opacity in the alt+f3 menu?
>
> applied until the next (de)activation
> there's so far no "remember" config - you can just force [temp] - and i
> mostly wnated to get rid of the broken config item in one or the other wa=
y.
good point
>
> > Personally I would prefer to have a kind of window specific rules for t=
he
> > effects and to move the opacity rule to the translucency effect.
>
> the opacity is a _NET_WM property on the window so
> a)  in particular in this case we'll probably have to care to keep visual
> and attrib in sync?!? as...
> b) ...the attribute is effectively set - w/ or w/o composition support -
> and can be read by e.g. the application.
that doesn't sound nice :-/ Hmm probably there is no other way.
>
> > has the time we have to live with that solution which is much better th=
an
>
> the broken state it was before :-D
>
> i'll set the rule for some windows and test for another to days, then
> commit if nobody yelled "STOP!" meanwhile (as you might have noticed in t=
he
> patch, i also needed to modify the EffectsHandlerImpl to prevent an
> incredibly annoying segfault ;-)
That's the reason for that return - I wondered why you added it :-D

Sounds like a good plan :-)

--nextPart2589980.zkKxFqKyP8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAAECAAYFAkppSGsACgkQ/umpWjNT6CKONwP9HARkri75KAMPfMH7WW98z68P
J2vW6WEYTVM97/ScRObDeB2J8SuzuRCH+ajna7gl7Mi80r0UlAfLhAF+GHbu293W
Hf0RFDOOHaZZFcdDpdabizm5v+cnyH8bcm8llppabF6keE5gfFM736Hy0lWCEAFY
LyOTknlAQLBgFVL/56g=
=ASln
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2589980.zkKxFqKyP8--

--===============0527806288==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
kwin mailing list
kwin@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwin

--===============0527806288==--