[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kwin
Subject:    Re: RFC: Effect ordering
From:       Rivo Laks <rivolaks () hot ! ee>
Date:       2008-03-06 21:22:23
Message-ID: 200803062322.23483.rivolaks () hot ! ee
[Download RAW message or body]

Ühel kenal päeval (neljapäev, 6. märts 2008) kirjutas Lubos Lunak:
> On Monday 25 of February 2008, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Additionally, we might want to think of grouping effects. The alt-tab
> > switcher would be an example for that, where you can choose one of the
> > above options.
> >
> > But then, there are probably people who want to use those effects and put
> > them on different shortcuts.
> >
> > Maybe having a 'basic effect configuration' where you can choose which
> > alt-tab switcher to use, how to destroy windows, how to minimize and pop
> > up windows, accessibility options and then having the "all effects" page
> > to be able to fine-tune / tweak / power-userize the effects. The more
> > effects there are, the harder it becomes to make sense of them and
> > configure the effects accordingly.
>
>  Yes. That widget could certainly use at least alphabetical ordering :-/.

And a search line, similar to that of Plasma's add widgets dialog.

> > Not sure how clean from a usability POV this three way stepping
> > (default, 'normal configuration', 'all effects') is
>
>  I think this could be added to the basic config we have now, in the first
> tab.

I agree. 3 different tabs would be overkill... well... actually we kind of 
have those 3 steps already: default config, the basic config tab and the 
advanced config tab. Maybe something else should be added to the basic config 
tab ("Extra effects" checkbox or something similar perhaps?)

Rivo
_______________________________________________
Kwin mailing list
Kwin@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwin

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]