On Thursday 05 July 2007 14:24:58 Rivo Laks wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval (neljapäev 05 juuli 2007) kirjutas Philip Falkner:
> > Well, why not just have arbitrary numbers?  Let every effect have a
> > "priority" number, e.g. 1 to 100 with 1 loaded first.  We ship effects
> > with relatively spread out numbers (10, 20, ...).  Effects that don't
> > interfere with each other could share numbers, like DimInactive and
> > DialogParent.
>
> Categories (as in names) might be simpler to remember...
> Anyway, I've got the ordering implemented here, but I don't seem to be able
> to come up with decent names for the categories, so I could commit it with
> numbers for now. If someone comes up with good enough names later, it can
> be changed quite easily. What do you think?

It sounds fine to me.  I take it you've split things up into a relatively 
small number of "phases?" (bad word choice, I know)  How have you broken them 
down?

> Rivo
> _______________________________________________
> Kwin mailing list
> Kwin@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwin

-- 
Philip Falkner
_______________________________________________
Kwin mailing list
Kwin@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwin