On Saturday 27 January 2007 14:20, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Saturday 27 January 2007 16:36, Rivo Laks wrote:

> > It would likely be a good idea to just check for ARB_npot extension and
> > omit the GL 2.0 check when checking if npot textures are supported.
>
>  Would it also make sense to just use the pot check and ignore the size?
> When pot is not supported, would using 2D in the unlikely case of the
> window having power-of-two sizes buy us anything compared to using
> RECTANGLE all the time?

Consistency with tfp_mode, for one.  The tfp spec says pot windows will always 
be 2D (issue 4).  Having said that, beryl always uses RECTANGLE in copy-mode.

To me, it makes sense to use 2D for pot textures, since it should always be at 
least as fast as RECTANGLE.

-- 
Philip Falkner
_______________________________________________
Kwin mailing list
Kwin@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwin