From kwin Sat Jan 27 20:26:03 2007 From: Philip Falkner Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:26:03 +0000 To: kwin Subject: Re: GetFBConfigs Message-Id: <200701271526.03425.philip.falkner () gmail ! com> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kwin&m=116992956217381 On Saturday 27 January 2007 14:20, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Saturday 27 January 2007 16:36, Rivo Laks wrote: > > It would likely be a good idea to just check for ARB_npot extension and > > omit the GL 2.0 check when checking if npot textures are supported. > > Would it also make sense to just use the pot check and ignore the size? > When pot is not supported, would using 2D in the unlikely case of the > window having power-of-two sizes buy us anything compared to using > RECTANGLE all the time? Consistency with tfp_mode, for one. The tfp spec says pot windows will always be 2D (issue 4). Having said that, beryl always uses RECTANGLE in copy-mode. To me, it makes sense to use 2D for pot textures, since it should always be at least as fast as RECTANGLE. -- Philip Falkner _______________________________________________ Kwin mailing list Kwin@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwin