From ktexteditor-devel  Mon Feb 12 06:37:37 2007
From: Christoph Cullmann <cullmann () absint ! com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:37:37 +0000
To: ktexteditor-devel
Subject: Re: rfc: View::isActiveView() ?
Message-Id: <200702120737.37029.cullmann () absint ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=ktexteditor-devel&m=117129901912863

On Sunday 11 February 2007 21:27, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> (a) Do you agree to add this?
> (b) Should I even remove 'virtual' or
> (c) remove the implementation (i.e. make it abstract like everything else)
>     and implement it in katepart?
I am for a) + b), and in the doxygen docs should be stated, that it does 
exactly this.

cu
Christoph
_______________________________________________
KTextEditor-Devel mailing list
KTextEditor-Devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/ktexteditor-devel