[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kstars-devel
Subject:    Re: KStars v3.5.0 Release Date?
From:       Eric Dejouhanet <eric.dejouhanet () gmail ! com>
Date:       2020-11-12 8:56:37
Message-ID: 1fmsudg3r0vlpq62c47k6n84.1605171397870 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

<html><head><style id="outgoing-font-settings">#response_container_BBPPID{font-family: \
initial; font-size:initial; color: initial;}</style></head><body \
style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); background-image: initial; line-height: \
initial;"><div id="response_container_BBPPID" style="outline:none;" dir="auto" \
contenteditable="false"> <div name="BB10" id="BB10_response_div_BBPPID" dir="auto" \
style="width:100%;"> I confirm, but this is probably a minor that can be addressed in \
3.5.1.</div> <div id="blackberry_signature_BBPPID" name="BB10" dir="auto">     <div \
id="_signaturePlaceholder_BBPPID" name="BB10" dir="auto"><p \
dir="ltr">eric.dejouhanet@gmail.com - https://astronomy.dejouha.net</p></div> \
</div></div><div id="_original_msg_header_BBPPID" dir="auto">                         \
<table width="100%" style="border-spacing: 0px; display: table; outline: none;" \
contenteditable="false"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2" style="padding: initial; \
font-size: initial; text-align: initial;">                           <div \
style="border-right: none; border-bottom: none; border-left: none; border-image: \
initial; border-top: 1pt solid rgb(181, 196, 223); padding: 3pt 0in 0in; font-family: \
Tahoma, &quot;BB Alpha Sans&quot;, &quot;Slate Pro&quot;; font-size: 10pt;">  <div \
id="from"><b>De:</b> murveit@gmail.com</div><div id="sent"><b>Envoyé:</b> 12 \
novembre 2020 09:37</div><div id="to"><b>À:</b> eric.dejouhanet@gmail.com</div><div \
id="reply_to"><b>Répondre à :</b> hy@murveit.com</div><div id="cc"><b>Cc:</b> \
mutlaqja@ikarustech.com; hy@murveit.com; rlancaste@gmail.com; \
sterne-jaeger@openfuture.de; kstars-devel@kde.org</div><div \
id="subject"><b>Objet:</b> Re: KStars v3.5.0 Release \
Date?</div></div></td></tr></tbody></table> <br> </div><!--start of _originalContent \
--><div name="BB10" dir="auto" style="background-image: initial; line-height: \
initial; outline: none;" contenteditable="false"><div dir="ltr"><b>Eric:</b>&nbsp;I \
see. So, can you check to see you don't have a file saved that's messing things up \
(e.g. delete your ~/.local/share/kstars/<wbr><a \
href="http://SavedFocusProfiles.ini">SavedFocusProfiles.ini</a><wbr> file if it \
exists, and then make sure you're using the "1-Focus Default" profile). You could \
play with the initialKeep and keepNum values in the kstars/ekos/auxiliary/<wbr><a \
href="http://stellarsolverprofile.cpp">stellarsolverprofile.cpp</a><wbr> file in the \
Focus method. (Also see the note to Rob \
below).&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><b>Rob:</b>&nbsp;could there be a bug that if you \
have a saved .ini file, then the initialKeep parameter no longer gets set and uses a \
very high default? I wouldn't be surprised if that's what messing Eric \
up.</div><div><br></div><div>Hy</div><div></div></div><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:24 \
AM Hy Murveit &lt;<a href="mailto:murveit@gmail.com">murveit@gmail.com</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb( 204 , 204 , 204 );padding-left:1ex"><div \
dir="ltr">Also, for the record, I do agree that Rob should either expose the \
initialKeep parameter or make it a multiple of the Keep parameter.<div>As it \
currently stands, it effectively limits the maximum value of the keep \
parameter.</div><div>H</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" \
class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:19 AM Hy Murveit &lt;<a \
href="mailto:murveit@gmail.com">murveit@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb( 204 , \
204 , 204 );padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Jasem: I can go either way I \
suppose, but in my experience, it's running reasonably quickly. I won't object too \
strongly if you want to fix it.</div><div><br></div>Eric:&nbsp; When I processed your \
images on my RPi4, they processed reasonably quickly:<div><br></div><blockquote \
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><div><i>Looking at the 1x1 \
image:</i></div><div><div><i>Computing the HFR took 1-2s, but that's using my "quick \
HFR" which only looks at stars in the middle 25% of the \
image.</i></div></div><div><div><i>Turning off the quick HFR option slowed it down to \
4-5 seconds (again possibly alongside guiding).</i></div></div><div><div><i>Are you \
using something slower than a RPi4? Could there be something else slowing down the \
computations?</i></div></div><div><div><i><br></i></div></div><div><div><i>Looking at \
the 2x2 image:</i></div></div><div><div><i>Seemed to take 1-2s without quickhfr, and \
1s or less with quickhfr.</i></div></div><div><div><i>FWIW, I run my focus with 2x2 \
binning of a ZWO ASI \
1600.</i></div></div></blockquote><div><div></div></div><div><br></div><div>We should \
figure out what the issue \
is.&nbsp;</div><div>Hy</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:50 \
PM Eric Dejouhanet &lt;<a \
href="mailto:eric.dejouhanet@gmail.com">eric.dejouhanet@gmail.com</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb( 204 , 204 , 204 );padding-left:1ex"><div \
style="background-color:rgb( 255 , 255 , 255 )"><div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733response_container_BBPPID" \
style="outline:none" dir="auto"> <div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733BB10_response_div_BBPPID" \
dir="auto" style="width:100%"> Which is my case right now. But in the particular \
subject of 3.5, I agree. I would like to know if the profiles are editable by the \
end-user when they are saved locally, I mean, are all parameters from the file loaded \
back properly?&nbsp;</div><div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733BB10_response_div_BBPPID" \
dir="auto" style="width:100%"><br></div><div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733BB10_response_div_BBPPID" \
dir="auto" style="width:100%">You know what I also mean here. Are there any tests \
validating that part?&nbsp;</div>                                                     \
<div id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733response_div_spacer_BBPPID" \
dir="auto" style="width:100%"> <br></div> <div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733blackberry_signature_BBPPID" \
dir="auto">     <div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733_signaturePlaceholder_BBPPID" \
dir="auto"><p dir="ltr"><a \
href="mailto:eric.dejouhanet@gmail.com">eric.dejouhanet@gmail.com</a> - <a \
href="https://astronomy.dejouha.net">https://astronomy.dejouha.net</a></p></div> \
</div></div><div id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733_original_msg_header_BBPPID" \
dir="auto">                                                                           \
<table width="100%" style="border-spacing:0px;display:table;outline:none"><tbody><tr><td \
colspan="2">                           <div \
style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid \
rgb( 181 , 196 , 223 );padding:3pt 0in 0in;font-family:'tahoma' , 'bb alpha sans' , \
'slate pro';font-size:10pt">  <div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733from"><b>De:</b> \
<a href="mailto:mutlaqja@ikarustech.com">mutlaqja@ikarustech.com</a></div><div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733sent"><b>Envoyé:</b> \
12 novembre 2020 08:46</div><div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733to"><b>À:</b> \
<a href="mailto:hy@murveit.com">hy@murveit.com</a></div><div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733cc"><b>Cc:</b> \
<a href="mailto:rlancaste@gmail.com">rlancaste@gmail.com</a>; <a \
href="mailto:eric.dejouhanet@gmail.com">eric.dejouhanet@gmail.com</a>; <a \
href="mailto:sterne-jaeger@openfuture.de">sterne-jaeger@openfuture.de</a>; <a \
href="mailto:kstars-devel@kde.org">kstars-devel@kde.org</a></div><div \
id="gmail-m_-6303917958834978578gmail-m_7337234694170452649gmail-m_2033396795361749696gmail-m_-1918649374322300733subject"><b>Objet:</b> \
Re: KStars v3.5.0 Release Date?</div></div></td></tr></tbody></table> <br> </div><div \
dir="auto" style="outline:none"><div dir="ltr">That's fine&nbsp;with me. As long as \
it does end up generating too many stars that ends up clogging HFR calculations \
unnecessarily.<div><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div \
dir="ltr"><div>--</div><div>Best Regards,<br>Jasem \
Mutlaq<br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:35 \
AM Hy Murveit &lt;<a href="mailto:murveit@gmail.com">murveit@gmail.com</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb( 204 , 204 , 204 );padding-left:1ex"><div \
dir="ltr">Jasem,<div><br></div><div>This close to the release, I'm inclined to be \
conservative here and let it be.&nbsp;</div><div>It's just something I came up with, \
not some reference algorithm, and it seems to be working as it was \
implemented.</div><div>I suggest that we&nbsp;can play with this in 3.5.1 if you \
want, but not mess with this \
now.</div><div><br></div><div>Hy</div><div><br></div></div><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:11 \
PM Jasem Mutlaq &lt;<a \
href="mailto:mutlaqja@ikarustech.com">mutlaqja@ikarustech.com</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb( 204 , 204 , 204 );padding-left:1ex"><div \
dir="ltr">Hello Robert,<div><br></div><div>Good catch on the partition &amp; keep \
stars. I think we ought to resolve this not by simply dividing by the number of \
chunks as this might skew the results. In some images, some regions are more \
star-rich than others. Maybe we should do a POST star detection but PRE star filter \
step where the # of stars are then trimmed to the required initial \
keep?</div><div><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div \
dir="ltr"><div>--</div><div>Best Regards,<br>Jasem \
Mutlaq<br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 9:41 AM \
Robert Lancaster &lt;<a href="mailto:rlancaste@gmail.com">rlancaste@gmail.com</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb( 204 , 204 , 204 );padding-left:1ex">Oh the more \
significant question that I asked though, I don't think we addressed it yet.&nbsp; \
Right now initial keep doesn't work the way you meant it to due to the \
partitions.&nbsp; Does that need to be changed?<br> <br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<br>
&gt; On Nov 12, 2020, at 1:37 AM, Robert Lancaster &lt;<a \
href="mailto:rlancaste@gmail.com">rlancaste@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt; <br>
&gt; Yep they are the same kind of thing when it comes to stars certainly.&nbsp; \
Your argument that HFR should correlate to magnitude is probably very true for stars, \
but not for nebulae or galaxies.&nbsp; They can be large but dim.&nbsp; It also might \
not be true for some stars with dust around them<br> &gt; <br>
&gt; Sent from my iPhone<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt;&gt; On Nov 12, 2020, at 1:24 AM, Hy Murveit &lt;<a \
href="mailto:murveit@gmail.com">murveit@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt;&gt; <br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
<!--end of _originalContent --></div></body></html>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic