> 1. For 1.0 we dropped monit due to instabilities of monit. An unreliable
> monitor is not what we need for 1.0

Is 'mon' not a suitable monitor?  I have had absolutely zero problems with 
it, montioring everything from system and rack temperature to drive space, 
services like SMTP, POP3, PGSQL, RADIUS and SSH and even have written a 
small SNMP trap --> mon trap gateway to monitor things like routers and 
switches.  It's very very flexible.

Regards,
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Kroupware mailing list
Kroupware@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kroupware