[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kplato
Subject:    Re: [kplato] [Planner Dev] Planner maintainership
From:       Raphael Langerhorst <raphael-langerhorst () gmx ! at>
Date:       2005-10-20 20:28:50
Message-ID: 200510202228.50196.raphael-langerhorst () gmx ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Donnerstag 20 Oktober 2005 22:10 schrieb Martin-Éric Racine:> to, 2005-10-20 kello 22:03 +0200, \
Raphael Langerhorst kirjoitti:> > I am currently aware of three open source project management> > \
applications:> >> > * Planner (Mr. Project)> > * Task Juggler - http://www.taskjuggler.org> > * KPlato - \
http://www.koffice.org and http://www.koffice.org/kplato>> Add Open Office.  They are developing a \
project management application> to be included in upcoming releases of the 2.0 productivity suite. Can \
you give me a link to that one? (I am not aware of OOo 2.0 providing such a component) ... just checked, \
... no, it does not provide one, at least not in 2.0.
> > It would be a good idea to discuss with the OASIS group to come up with> a unified DTD for project \
> > management XML files, the same way we already> have for text documents and spreadsheets. Presentation \
> > files are next.
The spec already covers presentations - KPresenter already implemented it.
In fact one of the KOffice developers is a member of the OASIS OpenDocument TC. He's aware of the \
possibility of a project management specification and willing to bring it in. We just need to come up \
with a good spec. The main point is that first we should work out what file format works and implement it \
and then bring it to the committee. This way we can make sure that the suggested spec is also usable. I'm \
willing to participate in creating such a spec. If anyone wants to join this effort then great, I'm very \
happy with this :) The other thing I see is that the spec already has 700+ pages! So I also want to make \
sure that the specification does not get "overloaded". Still, providing a clean and suitable \
specification for project management is certainly a good thing as it's certainly commonly used - probably \
not as much as text or spreadsheets, but still. And it belongs into the "office" domain. So the first \
step would be to get together and create a clean file format in the first place. If we think the file \
format is fine then we can forward it to the OASIS TC. Best wishes,-- Raphael \
Langerhorsthttp://raphael.g-system.at/blog_______________________________________________kplato mailing \
listkplato@kde.orghttps://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kplato


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]