[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kopete-devel
Subject:    Re: Updating libjingle in the tree, using an external one
From:       Pali =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= <pali.rohar () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-02-26 22:12:01
Message-ID: 6189950.6TXXS12hNj () pali
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Sunday 26 February 2012 18:57:33 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> writes:
> > So now libjingle in kopete tree is incompatible with upstream = not
> > possible to make voice call between kopete and clients which using
> > upstream libjingle.
> Is it due to specific changes in Kopete's copy of libjingle or did
> Google also drop compatibility in general between users of different
> libjingle releases? Was there any promise of compatibility to begin
> with?

Because google dropped (or not, but code does not working) support. In Kopete 
are only compile and bugfix patches. No specified support.

> 
> > What do you think? What is better? Support old Kopete clients or new
> > upstream libjingle clients?
> > 
> > I'm suggesting second option and delete libjingle subtree from kopete.
> 
> I always support not having local copies of libraries around.

Ok. So when google release new version (I'm hoping that devs include my patch) 
I update Kopete code to use external "call" binary (in kopete we have it under 
name "googletalk-call"), add some info about install process and remove 
libjingle tree from kopete svn.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]