[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kopete-devel
Subject:    [Kopete-devel] Re: Backporting to KDE_3_2_BRANCH ( AKA don't be so
From:       Matt Rogers <matt.rogers () kdemail ! net>
Date:       2004-01-29 13:26:36
Message-ID: 200401290726.36840.matt.rogers () kdemail ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 29 January 2004 06:11 am, Jason Keirstead wrote:
> On January 29, 2004 12:51 am, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If you are going to fix bugs that can be backported to the KDE 3.2
> > branch, and you're unwilling to make a patch, do cvs up -rKDE_3_2_BRANCH
> > in the appropriate directory, and then commit that patch, please try to
> > do the following:
>
> I am going to check out a 3.2 tree so I can backport my stuff from now on.
>
> Thanks for backporting that one last night though :)
>
> PS: Is it ok to backport something where we REMOVED an i18n string, like I
> did yesterday? I assume it is..?

yes, you can remove strings, you just can't create new ones.

Thank you for backporting (you're not the only one guilty of not 
backporting. :) )

Matt
-- 
VROOT!
_______________________________________________
Kopete-devel mailing list
Kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]