From kopete-devel Fri May 10 19:59:00 2002 From: Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 19:59:00 +0000 To: kopete-devel Subject: Re: [Kopete-devel] more design discussions (an also,KMMF bugs) X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kopete-devel&m=102106116923579 El Friday 10 May 2002 15:24, Andres Krapf escribió: > On Friday 10 May 2002 20:40, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote: > > protocol as argument? that breaks Kopete design completely > > we've talked about this extensively on this list with Martijn. since nobody > else participated in the discussion, i just assumed everybody else silently > agreed. > > so now that i hear from you, let's start over. why does it break kopete's > design ? > > keep in mind the reason for passing the protocol as an argument: the > messageSent signal in KMM is just not well designed (the reasons for this > have been mentioned on the list, more than once). > > cheers, if I would designed Kopete in that way, I would just made a association betewwn plugin names (or ids) and plugins.... but Kopete doesnt behave that way, and it doesnt know about the plugins more than a hash that associate spec files to plugin objects. (may be you can use that) Cheers Duncan -- ============================================= Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett | duncan@puc.cl | KDE Developer | duncan@kde.org | http://www.mac-vicar.com | ICQ: 31947372 | - Kopete, The KDE InstantMessenger www.kdedevelopers.net/kopete ============================================= KDE 3.0, Konquer your Desktop. www.kde.org ============================================= Public Key available at: www.mac-vicar.com/duncan/pgpkey.txt Key ID : 667E42D1 Fingerprint : 75DA 7B97 1FD6 ADB9 A880 BA9F CD1E B6A9 667E 42D1 _______________________________________________ Kopete-devel mailing list Kopete-devel@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel