From kolab-users  Wed Apr 14 11:11:39 2004
From: Bo Thorsen <bo () klaralvdalens-datakonsult ! se>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:11:39 +0000
To: kolab-users
Subject: Re: Proko2 is Good News Towards Kolab2
Message-Id: <200404141311.40265.bo () klaralvdalens-datakonsult ! se>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kolab-users&m=117347145007629

=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 14 April 2004 08:48, Ivaylo Toshev wrote:
> True. but againt: I mean totally different approach of storage - not in
> client but on server. I know that this is totally different technical
> conception compared with current kolab, but if this is some kind new
> project, i thought that considering this option will not be just waste
> of time.

Well, no one will stop you from doing that of course. But the Kolab=20
concept in this part is so basic that it's next to impossible to change.=20
We chose an IMAP based solution from day 1 with this project, back more=20
than two years ago.

Now, if you don't want to replicate locally, why not just use the=20
non-storing mode of KMail IMAP? Or use POP3 to remove the mails from the=20
server? By not using a database, options like these are available too.

Bo.

=2D --=20

     Bo Thorsen                 |   Praestevejen 4
     Senior Software Engineer   |   5290 Marslev
     Klar=E4lvdalens Datakonsult  |   Denmark
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAfRxrmT99lwfUS5IRAuNUAKDNj+pFJEmWXyMtXrXbXGeEQAF/QwCfUZos
owvFhjo9aJpSHbcQtspJ8V0=3D
=3DF1p1
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----