On Monday 23 October 2000 06:55, Wolf-Michael Bolle wrote:

> > Hi,
>=20
> > > Of course it might turn out that even
> > > though I'm using the KomlParser class I'm still re-inventing the wh=
eel.
> >
> > No! Please use QXML/QDom !
> >
> > KomlParser is there for compatibility reasons only (for kword and kpr=
esenter) !
> > And it's a wrapper around QDom, so better use QDom directly.
> >
> > Hoping it's not too late....
>=20
> It't not entirely too late. I encapsulated the KomlParser calls cause i=
t turned out to
> be convenient for me.=20

Yes but this class is also very inefficient compared to QDom itself, and =
its API
isn't really good either, compared to QDom.

> I'll just call QDom stuff directly, then.

Thanks :)

> I would suggest that you make a few big comments into the KomlParser co=
de that indicate
> that it should not be used any more.

Good idea. Done.

--=20
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~david/, http://www.konqueror.org/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today
See http://www.kde.org/kde1-and-kde2.html for how to set up KDE 2

_______________________________________________
Koffice-devel mailing list
Koffice-devel@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel