[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: koffice
From:       Cyrille Berger Skott <cberger () cberger ! net>
Date:       2011-02-02 8:16:06
Message-ID: 201102020916.06802.cberger () cberger ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> Your chosen group naming system is not only abstract and meaningless to
> anyone  who isn't in your clique, it does rather little more than to make
> you appear non-serious and petty to people on the outside. Why is that?
> Because it can't be taken serious and it is, ultimately, petty.
This is kind of a non-issue. Since it is a koffice decision and a such needs 
to be decided by the koffice community.

Right now we have two people in favour of my version of the text, one person 
in favor of Thomas version and one person that thinks we should not care.

-- 
Cyrille Berger Skott
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]