[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: kofficetests validation
From:       Cyrille Berger Skott <cberger () cberger ! net>
Date:       2010-11-09 15:45:34
Message-ID: 201011091645.34110.cberger () cberger ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 09 November 2010, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> Ok, I cannot say I disagree. Just that it would be nice to have many docs
> for the use-case you mention. Of course the case where we load invalid
> docs and save valid ones would be interesting, but that's reaching too far
> at the moment.
That said, nothing prevent to have both valid and invalid version of the same 
document :)

-- 
Cyrille Berger Skott
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]