[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Principles for new name
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date:       2010-11-06 19:16:19
Message-ID: 201011062016.19952.boud () valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 06 November 2010, C. Boemann wrote:

> Yeah, I don't like it either. Reminds me of something pompous with no real 
> value, old fashioned and boring. The sort of name that would actually turn me 
> off rather than just being neutral. This goes for many of the latin style words \
> with more than 2 syllables btw.

A name should suggest an identity, and for that it needs to be fairly abstract. \
Calligra is fairly abstract, but perhaps not abstract enough. But using \
$ORDINARY_WORD + suite|office isn't going to create an identity either.


-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org
Ceterum censeo lapsum particulorum probae delendum esse
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]