[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: koffice 2.3 beta 4 ?
From:       Johannes Simon <johannes.simon () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-11-05 11:38:16
Message-ID: 82030D35-1B31-4C85-8E5B-C7FCE2F7A37A () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Sure, that can and should be done as well. As long as these commits go into the \
feature branch (at least at the moment). That's not what I consider "counteracting" \
:-)

Am 05.11.2010 um 12:29 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:

> On Friday 05 November 2010, Johannes Simon wrote:
> > I think Sven made a point. It should be each maintainer's task to make sure the \
> > commits don't counteract our current goal.
> 
> It's a balancing act... I'm fine with people taking some time off from bug fixing \
> now and then for what Lukas calls "relax coding" :-). 
> -- 
> Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org
> Ceterum censeo lapsum particulorum probae delendum esse
> _______________________________________________
> koffice-devel mailing list
> koffice-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]