From koffice-devel Thu Oct 28 10:34:04 2010 From: Sven Langkamp Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:34:04 +0000 To: koffice-devel Subject: Re: KOffice 2.3 release Message-Id: X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=128826207621674 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============0793212200==" --===============0793212200== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64084c8843d160493aae1a6 --0016e64084c8843d160493aae1a6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > More thought on the subject ? Should we aim, anyway, at a beta 4 given > the number of blockers ? And then check our status ? > > > Considering the number of blockers I think another beta is a good idea. --0016e64084c8843d160493aae1a6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Cyrille Berger = Skott <cberger@= cberger.net> wrote:

More thought on the subject ? S= hould we aim, anyway, at a beta 4 given the number of blockers ? And then c= heck our status ?



Considering the number of blockers I think anoth= er beta is a good idea.
--0016e64084c8843d160493aae1a6-- --===============0793212200== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ koffice-devel mailing list koffice-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel --===============0793212200==--