[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: KOffice split
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date:       2010-10-27 14:47:01
Message-ID: 201010271647.01461.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 27. October 2010 13.48.09 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > I agree with you there, the desktop vs mobile differentiation is not a
> > good one. The differentiation I wrote about in my email is two groups
> > that have a different focus, any focus. The focus itself is not the
> > important part. In the last year this focus has been very strongly on
> > the mobile version for commercial purposes. Its about the MSOffice
> > compatibility and feature completeness. Again, not just mobile.
[]
> For me it's also not business vs home/school user definitely. 
[]
> Moreover I failed to see why the recently rather intensified works
> e.g. on charts compatibility is a bad and 'business' thing.

Let me repeat; its NOT about the focus itself. The examples you give are of 
specific focus. To work on them or not is NOT the point and your counter shows 
you misunderstood. Bottom line is that I *do* think those are useful.
But thats totally not the topic of this thread.

-- 
Thomas Zander
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]