The reason it was suggested to move forward with a KOffice split, instead of following your suggestion, is that it is widely acknowledge that the problem are not related to Desktop vs Mobile, if it was so, it would only have started a year ago, but KOffice has been into troubly water for longer than that, it might have worked ok when I joined, but as applications became more and more coupled the situation became worse.
I can understand your desire to attract attention to Group A, but I would appreciate if you could avoid spreading lies and bullshits about the intention of group B, who is as dedicated as anyone else to the value of KDE, FLOSS and to producing an open environment for the development of a suite that target both the Desktop, Mobile, Netbook or Tablet environment. This is why both groups are invited to stay on the KDE infrastructure.
As for choosing which group, I think all the person that need to know, know what each group is about, and has all the information they need to take an informed decision.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
--Boundary-01=_Ev8xMT49Pi8uX4H-- --===============0080309629== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ koffice-devel mailing list koffice-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel --===============0080309629==--