From koffice-devel  Wed Oct 13 21:43:02 2010
From: Thomas Pfeiffer <colomar () autistici ! org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:43:02 +0000
To: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: Usability Topics
Message-Id: <201010132343.02444.colomar () autistici ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=128700609521571

> > On Sunday 29. August 2010 10.48.17 C. Boemann wrote:
> > > On Sunday 29 August 2010 10:22:38 Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > Big +1, though I would say "Coloring Tool"
> > 
> > Fine :)
> 
> +1
> 
> > > > If we want to find a volunteer to code this we should find a
> > > > suggestion that doesn't require research into docker placement etc.
> > > > Don't you agree?
> > > 
> > > Docker placement is an unrelated problem to merging the styles docker
> > > and tools.
> > > 
> > > For now just let the tool return 2or 3 dockers and let the same plugin
> > > provide the styles docker. Then in a later step we can work on the
> > > dockers.
> > > 
> > > First step is merging the code bases, without doing (m)any other code
> > > changes.
> > 
> > Good point, I like that idea to focus on what we can :)
> 
> I'm glad that we seem to converge to a solution we might agree upon.
> And I agree that it makes sense to get it to work at all in the first
> place. Docker placement is definitely an issue but I suppose users can
> live with the current situation until a general solution for docker
> placement is found (which needs to be adressed to get rid of the "jumping
> UI" situation anyway).
> 

I'd like to follow up on this. Has anything happened on this front yet since 
we discussed it in August or will it have to wait until after the freeze?
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel