From koffice-devel  Thu Sep 23 13:46:03 2010
From: zander () kde ! org
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:46:03 +0000
To: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: Bugs against the Essen branch
Message-Id: <201009231546.04069.zander () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=128524963411472

On Thursday 23. September 2010 14.09.10 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > However, it is true that using bugzilla for bugs tested against that
> > branch does not work well. Unless the bugs are correctly flaged as LATER
> > or INFO.
> 
> So, is this the consensus then?  To indeed add the bugs and use status
> LATER?  INFO seems strange to me since the info is supposed to be in the
> bug already.

I don't like 'LATER' because the bug can very well be specific to the main 
branch only.

I think the testers should only reports bugs in bugzilla for bugs that can be 
reproduced in trunk. This information is important to decide if the fix should 
go on trunk and thus be scheduled for 2.3.0

As such the resolution of "NEEDMOREINFO" makes a lot of sense and thats why I 
asked for this.
Notice, btw, that a bug that got the requested info quickly got scheduled 
properly.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=251562

So lets do the work and get the test done against trunk and make everyone 
happy :)
-- 
Thomas Zander
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel