From koffice-devel Thu Sep 23 13:34:45 2010 From: "Adam C." Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:34:45 +0000 To: koffice-devel Subject: Re: Bugs against the Essen branch Message-Id: X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=128524891810301 On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:17:39 +0200, Cyrille Berger wrote: > On Thursday 23 September 2010, Inge Wallin wrote: >> INFO seems strange to me since the info is supposed to be in the bug >> already. > Well it is missing the info wether the bug is reproductible with trunk > or not. > why can't we just create a new version koffice-essen (or koffice 2.35 if strings are not allowed) and file the bugs against it? just like boud said. if we test the bugs and they are valid against trunk, we can change the version. imo this is the simplest and best solution. imo it's bad to mark them as resolved later, because that may introduce a bad feeling for the testers. a second point is, that resolved bugs are hidden, and that's wrong, because they are still valid. if someone wants to file bugs against trunk, we will get many duplicates. just my 2 cents.. -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ koffice-devel mailing list koffice-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel