[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Bugs against the Essen branch
From:       Cyrille Berger <cberger () cberger ! net>
Date:       2010-09-23 10:47:09
Message-ID: 201009231247.09892.cberger () cberger ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 23 September 2010, LukasT.dev@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday 23 September 2010 11:59:33 zander@kde.org wrote:
> > the
> > question is why Nokia is forking off the main branch in the first place.
> > The  main branch is stabilized for release and Nokia is intending to
> > release too. So why the hell are we not using the same codebase?
> 
> Sorry, but I find this clear, at least for me. First they can do whatever
> they want and what they need. They don't work on KOffice just for fun and
> they need to deliver.
Yup, and this is totally acceptable.

However, it is true that using bugzilla for bugs tested against that branch 
does not work well. Unless the bugs are correctly flaged as LATER or INFO.

As for the commits of patch that are not accepted by the community, there will 
be a review before merge. So it is unlikely they will be accepted later.

-- 
Cyrille Berger
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]