[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: koffice/libs/kotext/styles
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date:       2010-08-08 10:10:09
Message-ID: 201008081210.10071.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 8. August 2010 04.33.55 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> . No review-request, no 
> discussion, no IRC ping, no mail, no word and as usual hidden inside is a 
> revert. A classic regression by aggression.

I don't agree with you here; there is not an agressive revert and the situation 
is that you have had a LOT of opportunities and time to write a patch taking 
into account the one and simple objection I voiced[1]. This you didn't take for 
many iterations and just committed anyway.
See attached mail which I sent to you privately weeks ago as a last attampt to 
give you again the opportunity to follow the rules and fix the commit you made 
ignoring a voiced concern.

It is not helpful to tell me I am violating reviewboard rules when you are the 
one that committed with an open objection to your solution. The rules are there 
to work together and get consensus. They explicitly say you don't commit 
something when there is an objection to it. You work together and follow the 
rules or you find another project to work in.

This single patch has been comitted and reverted by you a total of 5 times, a 
much better patch was created for loading code and later abandoned and you 
again committed the already known-to-be-wrong patch. After which I wrote you 
the attached email. Which you ignored for 3 weeks now.

1) http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/4529/
-- 
Thomas Zander

["forwarded message" (message/rfc822)]

From: Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org>
To: Sebastian Sauer <mail@dipe.org>
Subject: Re: koffice/libs/kotext/styles
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:30:17 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.31-14-generic; KDE/4.4.90; x86_64; svn-1145547; \
                2010-06-22)
References: <20100716083916.AE9E2AC852@svn.kde.org> \
                <201007161111.18650.zander@kde.org> \
                <201007172109.05840.mail@dipe.org>
In-Reply-To: <201007172109.05840.mail@dipe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201007172330.18055.zander@kde.org>
X-UID: 2698

On Saturday 17. July 2010 21.09.05 you wrote:
> On Friday 16 July 2010 11:11:17 you wrote:
> > You are again violating the review-request rules; if you don't understand
> > them please ask someone else to explain them to you.
> > 
> > This commit is wrong as I explained a lot of times in various different
> > ways.
> 
> man, I don't have time and energy for such games. I provided a damn lot of
> different solutions for the same small problem and yet you object all
> patches without proving anything I can use to have the problem solved
> *now*.

I'm sorry you feel that way; I have a similar feeling that I explained the same 
problem with your work again and again and again. You keep on making the same 
mistake. Explaining why you disagree will not change the facts that what you 
did is wrong.

I also provided a suggestion for a solution. Which I explained various times to 
you.

In return you have been writing rude responses that were not very constructive 
at all and you repeatedly ignore the rules for working together that we set and 
follow in KOffice.
 
> > Please revert.

Please revert the incorrect patch.

I am on holidays for a couple of weeks from tomorrow, with very limited 
internet access. I'm looking forward to a good solution in svn after I come 
back.

-- 
Thomas Zander



_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]