On Thursday, July 15, 2010 09:56:53 pm Carlos Licea wrote:
> On Jueves 15 Julio 2010 12:43:46 Jos van den Oever escribió:
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2010 07:39:00 pm Carlos Licea wrote:
> > > > > http://tools.oasis-
> > > > > open.org/issues/secure/QuickSearch.jspa?searchString=annotation
> > > 
> > > Thank you Jos. This is exactly what we needed.
> > 
> > Here is the issue:
> > http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3022
> > 
> > > > that gets my vote too.
> > > > 
> > > > Thorsten
> > > 
> > > I'm very pleased you are in favor of this proposal. However, I do find
> > > it odd, after all what we are going to do is no longer valid ODF, it
> > > seems to me that you were more concerned with interoperability with
> > > OOo rather than ODF in general.
> > 
> > I think Thorsten thought being similar to MSOOXML was not a good idea
> > when ODF has a near-working solution. The only change in the spec that
> > is needed is to allow office:annotation in a draw:page.
> 
> I would disagree. That would imply that Thorsten knew that such half-baked
> solution existed, but if he did know, he never mentioned it. In any case
> the topic is settled now.

He knew about offcice:annotation, but not that OpenOffice uses it for slide 
comments. I quote from his mail:
"I did some more reading and what I have found in odf that comes close to what 
you want to do is the tag <office:annotation>. However the tag is only possible 
in a text:p or a text:list element."

> > Another solution would be to annotate specific part of the slide with RDF
> > triples. RDF in ODF allows you to add any arbitrary data to any element
> > that can is identified by an attribute of type ID.
> > 
> > "Every XML element that is defined by this specification and has an
> > attribute of type ID may be described ...".
> > 
> > <draw:page> has attribute xml:id and hence any data, including comments,
> > can be attached to it.
> 
> I already started reworking towards the officeooo:annotation, I would
> prefer not to start over again. It's a cool idea, though. Albeit, I'm not
> totally sure it would be the same thing, those annotations would require
> some other container to be attached to, while officeooo:annotation is its
> own container.
I agree that officeooo:annotation is the way to go. Just mentioned RDF as a 
possibility.

Cheers,
Jos

-- 
Jos van den Oever, software architect
+49 391 25 19 15 53
http://kogmbh.com/legal/
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel