On 15 July 2010 19:39, Carlos Licea wrote: > I'm very pleased you are in favor of this proposal. However, I do find it odd, > after all what we are going to do is no longer valid ODF, it seems to me that > you were more concerned with interoperability with OOo rather than ODF in > general. "Valid odf" was used here a few times. Side note, could someone clarify: isn't allowing custom namespaces the purpose of going with XML from the very beginning? -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek  http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek  Kexi & KOffice (http://www.kexi-project.org, http://www.koffice.org)  KDE Software Development Platform on MS Windows (http://windows.kde.org) _______________________________________________ koffice-devel mailing list koffice-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel