On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Rex Dieter wrote:

> OK, that was my understanding too, and *ass*umed koffice would be the newer 
> provider of wv2.  So, I don't understand the worry about conflicting with 
> sourceforge's (older) wv2.  

I think that's a temporary thing, since wv2 is still packaged. And we're right now
not working on making koffice's wv2 available for wider usage -- if people ask about
it, it's early enough to do something about it.

Boudewijn

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel