From koffice-devel  Sat Oct 31 10:09:59 2009
From: Cyrille Berger <cberger () cberger ! net>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:09:59 +0000
To: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: Emf libray
Message-Id: <200910311110.00203.cberger () cberger ! net>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=125698386330979

On Friday 30 October 2009, Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Friday 30 October 2009 21:58:45 cricketc@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 09:16:51 Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 27. October 2009 13.26.28 ext Inge Wallin wrote:
> 
> []
> 
> > > > I read that as two highly knowledgeable persons giving their
> > > > lawyer(!) opinion that it's ok.
> > >
> > > You spent some time researching and quoted your sources and gave
> > > compelling arguments. Awesome :)
> > >
> > > I think this addresses my worries just fine, so no objections from me.
> >
> > Does this mean we're OK with moving wv2 into koffice svn, or do people
> >  still have objections?
> 
> For me it would be fine.  Anybody against it should speak up.
I agree. I think it would belong to koffice/filters/kword/msword-odf

-- 
Cyrille Berger
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel